A client of mine asked me yesterday, “Why do so many agents fail to include interior pictures of their listings… or any pictures, for that matter?”
Good question.
Years ago, when digital cameras were fairly expensive, it was somewhat understandable why you didn’t see many interior pictures of the various homes for sale. It was the cost. Most agents, contrary to popular belief, are not making the big bucks. With all the other expenses involved in this business, sometimes it’s hard to find the money for everything to keep up.
My first digital camera cost me $900, and a camera of its capabilities would probably cost around $100 today.. if not less. It recorded images in some proprietary format instead of jpeg. As a result, I have some wonderful pictures of the Mayan pyramids in Belize that I’ll never see again (as the Windows 95 program that decoded them is now obsolete).
But I digress.
Nowadays, anyone can buy a decent digital camera for a few hundred dollars… and the listing services make it fairly easy to upload the images to their respective servers.
So why don’t all agents do this?
Some agents believe that pictures might drive away potential buyers, rather than attract them, to certain properties.
Personally, I believe a property “is what it is”, and should be shown as such, so that’s not much of a reason, if you ask me.
Some pictures, however, speak volumes. I remember taking a bunch of pictures of a totally trashed house that was boarded up. Boarded-up houses are dark inside and having a good set of pictures can help a buyer understand the condition of the property. And yes, it did sell.



