It Will Take Higher Gas Prices For Residents To Vote YES

As a long-time Gwinnett resident, I understand why the residents have avoided mass transit in the county. Gwinnetians want good and adequate roads – not trains. That’s the way it’s been for the last 18 years that MARTA has been trying to make inroads into Gwinnett.

Fellow broker Jeff Cape from Lavista Associates put it this way:

Gwinnett residents have declined MARTA’s advances for the last 18 years.

On Tuesday, we’ll likely turn MARTA away again.

Rising fuel prices seem to form the primary argument to bring MARTA to Gwinnett. The environmental aspect scores points, too.

But there are a few reasons that MARTA won’t sway us this time, either.

> We like our cars and our roads. We like our cars so much that even with gas at $4 per gallon, MARTA won’t be enough to get us out of them. We like our roads so much that we name them after the people who build them or in memory of people we admire.

> We won’t necessarily save money with MARTA. It costs $1.75 to make a one-way trip on MARTA. How far away you work from home could determine how cost-effective MARTA is.

I live in Norcross and work 10 minutes from home. If a station was built near Jimmy Carter Boulevard and I-85, I would have to drive to the station. I don’t think it would be worth a drive and a $1.75 ticket each way, or a monthly pass. If you work downtown, it might be worth the costs. Maybe.

> We like control of who rides with us. Most of us have seen the infamous YouTube video of "Soulja Girl" berating an elderly MARTA passenger who was minding her own business. The girl decided to give the older lady an impromptu performance that involved shouting profanities in her face.

Perform a simple search on YouTube for "crazy public transportation" and you will find many videos of various unfortunate passengers across the country. Who knows when you’ll find yourself riding along with someone who forgot to take their meds that day, or just got laid off and decides to take it out on fellow passengers. What if someone prefers not to wear clothes, as seen in a classic "Seinfeld" episode?

I’m not saying MARTA isn’t the right thing to do. It would make sense for one of the largest counties in the state to have some mode of public transportation. I just don’t think people are going to be that gung-ho to ride it. For that reason, MARTA won’t get a positive response on Tuesday.

Personally, I prefer to be in control of who gets naked in my immediate vicinity.

I think that pretty much says it all.



As always, if you have any questions regarding real estate in the greater Atlanta area, feel free to contact me here.

6 Responses to “Gas May Be $4 – But Gwinnett Will Likely Continue To Say NO To MARTA”

As predicted, the MARTA proposition in Gwinnett did not pass. WSB reported that there was a split along party lines, based upon a straw poll… with Democrats favoring the extra one-cent sales tax hike to bring rail into the county with 70% support. Republicans, however, had lukewarm support for passage with only 37% supporting the proposition.

Residents in Cobb County have also rejected plans to bring rail into the county.

I am always astounded by the short-sightedness, selfishness, and plain sutpidity displayed in this region, especially when it comes to public transport. Jeff Cape’s post is just simple-mined idiotic macho swaggering. No, we do not love our roads and our cars as much as he says–yeah, if I only had to drive 10 minutes everyday, maybe, but a lot of people waste a lot more of their lives–alone, isolated–in cars than that.
Second, a few disruptive instances on public transport–compared to millions of smooth rides people have everyday–is not a sound, intelligent reason to dismiss it altogether. That’s just sensationalism and another example of this society wanting to barricade itself from problems rather than getting into the mix of life.
Did Mr. Cape ever consider the cost-benefit ratio of his few imagined naked people versus the millions of pounds of pollutants that would not go into our children’s lungs? The increased time public transport allows people to say, I don’t know, read or talk with other people outside their daily orbit? The competitive edge Atlanta would have over other backward cities that still think the way ATL does now about public transport? (Charlotte is already gaining fast on us.)
No, instead he creates unlikely scenarios and can’t see beyond his own windshield.
Living in Atlanta stinks compared to many other more enlightened cities up north–it’s a pain to get anywhere, not that there’s anywhere but generic strip malls to go to anyway. Then add many people like Jeff Cape who still think their outdated viewpoint is relevant to a fast-growing, globalized world with almost 7 billion people. Get with it Gwinnett.

Not everyone likes the whole mass transit experience.

Hi Jaimye.

I just stumbled upon this site and read your response.

A few things – the AJC heavily edited the column you see from what I originally wrote. Not that the message is different, but some items like “we name our roads after…” was written toungue-in-cheek..the ajc edited that and worded it differently than I wrote it (which was supposed to read funnier).

Also, I actually did do a cost-benefit analysis in my column. Again, the ajc cut that out mostly. My example sited that if I drove to, say, Lenox Square everyday, the cost to ride MARTA would save me a little over a dollar a day.

That brought me to my larger point. When you are on that train, you’re stuck with the people on it, good or bad. I used other examples (again, cut), like the girl who got trapped with 6 Mormons who spent their time trying to convert people in between stops.

I realize these are mostly isolated incidents, but they are far from “unlikely”…they are just common enough to make people by and large not want to ride MARTA. In your car, you don’t have to deal with that nonsense.

All that said, the column was actually written with a more humorous tint as I said – not as straightforward as you read it.

Just a couple of the reasons people won’t vote for it.

I appreciate hearing your viewpoint, however.

>Jeff: Thanks for the follow up.

I am not at all surprised that the AJC carved up your piece… just somewhat surprised to the extent that they had apparently done so.

I wonder if they still have the mindset that each page of copy costs X dollars to produce…

:lol:

Yeah, when you don’t get paid to write ‘em, they can pretty much edit them as they see fit.

Something to say?

« Back to text comment